Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1BA9FA305
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:06:51 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 26517-02; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:06:49 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7010E9FA253;
	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:06:48 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l7V46CXD014620;
	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:06:12 -0400 (EDT)
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>, bruce@momjian.us,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: broken doc 
In-reply-to: <46D78CCE.5000700@dunslane.net> 
References: <45E8B758.3030704@commandprompt.com>
	<200708310204.l7V24X216252@momjian.us>
	<20070831.122417.104039743.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
	<46D78CCE.5000700@dunslane.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
	message dated "Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:36:46 -0400"
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:06:12 -0400
Message-ID: <14619.1188533172@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200708/1171
X-Sequence-Number: 107093

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tatsuo Ishii wrote
>> Can someone please fix this?

> It's working for me

On Fedora Core 6's sgml toolchain, HEAD builds but un-commenting those
two index entries fails, just as Tatsuo says.

I'm no expert in this, but looking at the complained-of bookindex.sgml
entries makes me think that those index entries have a semantic conflict
with these entries over in indices.sgml:

   <indexterm>
    <primary>GiST</primary>
    <see>index</see>
   </indexterm>

   <indexterm>
    <primary>GIN</primary>
    <see>index</see>
   </indexterm>

Perhaps we need to have a meeting of the minds on who gets to define the
primary index entries about GiST and GIN?

Peter will probably have a clearer idea about how to fix this ...

			regards, tom lane