Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ab87V-0003Wl-2M for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 14:51:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ab87T-0004Vo-Gc for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 14:51:19 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ab87S-0004Uv-CZ for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 14:51:18 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ab87P-0008IL-Ow for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 14:51:17 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u22EpBQ9014898; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 09:51:11 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Magnus Hagander cc: Maciek Sakrejda , pgsql-docs Subject: Re: Getting Started section In-reply-to: References: <14672.1456929392@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Wed, 02 Mar 2016 09:39:52 -0500" Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 09:51:11 -0500 Message-ID: <14897.1456930271@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org Magnus Hagander writes: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Agreed, but I should think that properly packaged versions of Postgres >> will come with some package-specific instructions. Is that missing >> in Debian's version, or out of date, or did he just not read it? > It's definitely there for debian - it's in > /usr/share/doc/postgresql-common/README.Debian.gz > The bigger question is, is it worth actually more or less importing the > contents of that into our main documentation. I'm definitely -1 on that; there are too many distinct packagings and they change asynchronously to our releases. As a concrete example, the docs for Red Hat's version needed to change when they moved from SysV init scripts to systemd boot. Would we want to keep *both* versions of that in our manual, and explain exactly which RHEL/CentOS/Fedora versions the different texts applied to? No thanks ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs