Subject: Re: no more SGML empty tags
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <6d137bd0-eef6-1d91-d9b8-1a5e9195a899@2ndquadrant.com>
 <1736.1508425918@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Organization: 2ndQuadrant
Message-ID: <14e387fe-2c04-be40-e05a-1048d3d4588c@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:58:04 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1736.1508425918@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org

On 10/19/17 11:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> I just want to point out that this patch has more or less entirely
> destroyed any hope of cleanly back-patching documentation changes.
> 
> Should we consider applying the same transformation to the back
> branches?

Good point.  There is an additional issue to consider about
backpatching, about which I have started a separate thread.  It might
depend on the outcome of that what we want to do here.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs