Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhwP6-0004yC-2j for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 16:12:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhwP4-0007g3-Te for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 16:12:50 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhwP4-0007eJ-Mx for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 16:12:50 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhwP2-00088G-JO for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 16:12:49 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1A2GCfb31514987; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 12:12:41 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" cc: Laurenz Albe , "pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Be more clear what names can be used for tables with "CREATE TABLE"? In-reply-to: References: <13dcf5e60a2cdfd8ea68da9a2569287e342e87ab.camel@cybertec.at> <1139298.1635782656@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" message dated "Tue, 02 Nov 2021 12:38:28 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1514985.1635869561.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 12:12:41 -0400 Message-ID: <1514986.1635869561@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" writes: >> "The name of the table must be distinct from the name of any other >> relation (table, sequence, index, view, materialized view, or foreign >> table) in the same schema." > Works for me, +1 Done that way, then. regards, tom lane