pg.ddx.io pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedpostgresql.conf
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* postgresql.conf
@ 2019-06-19 16:23 PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
2019-06-20 00:12 ` Re: postgresql.conf Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: PG Doc comments form @ 2019-06-19 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; +Cc: histamineblkr@gmail.com
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/config-setting.html
Description:
I noticed on this page:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/config-setting.html
There are a few places that an include statement is made like so:
include 'shared.conf'
include 'memory.conf'
include 'server.conf'
It may be that the CentOS 7 postgres package differs from the PostgreSQL
documentation here, but I noticed that in the postgresql.conf the syntax for
including has an "=" between the keyword and value:
#------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# CONFIG FILE INCLUDES
#------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# These options allow settings to be loaded from files other than the
# default postgresql.conf.
#include_dir = '' # include files ending in '.conf' from
# a directory, e.g., 'conf.d'
#include_if_exists = '' # include file only if it exists
#include = ''
Is the "=" not needed?
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: postgresql.conf
2019-06-19 16:23 postgresql.conf PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
@ 2019-06-20 00:12 ` Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Paquier @ 2019-06-20 00:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: histamineblkr@gmail.com; pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 04:23:08PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> It may be that the CentOS 7 postgres package differs from the PostgreSQL
> documentation here, but I noticed that in the postgresql.conf the syntax for
> including has an "=" between the keyword and value:
>
> Is the "=" not needed?
Both grammars are fine.
--
Michael
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-20 00:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-19 16:23 postgresql.conf PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
2019-06-20 00:12 ` Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox