public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Fujii Masao <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: add argument type to postgres_fdw docs
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:24:49 +0900
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYAPR01MB2896DEB25C3B0D57F6139768C40F9@TYAPR01MB2896.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
References: <TYAPR01MB2896DEB25C3B0D57F6139768C40F9@TYAPR01MB2896.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
On 2021/06/16 12:39, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I add argument type to postgres-fdw parameters in postgres-fdw.sgml.
> I think this change is kind. Do you think?
I think this change would improve the postgres_fdw docs.
- <term><literal>extensions</literal></term>
+ <term><literal>extensions</literal> (<type>enum</type>)</term>
Since each value in "extensions" parameter is not limitted like
shared_preload_libraries, its type should be "string"?
- <term><literal>fdw_startup_cost</literal></term>
+ <term><literal>fdw_startup_cost</literal> (<type>double precision</type>)</term>
- <term><literal>fdw_tuple_cost</literal></term>
+ <term><literal>fdw_tuple_cost</literal> (<type>double precision</type>)</term>
Since "floating point" is used for GUC docs, "floating point" should be
used for the sake of consistenty, instead?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: add argument type to postgres_fdw docs
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox