X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5851A5E3F15
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 15 Aug 2004 00:46:16 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 66966-01
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 15 Aug 2004 03:46:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CCE5E37D0
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 15 Aug 2004 00:46:12 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7F3kDo3015859;
	Sat, 14 Aug 2004 23:46:13 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>,
	pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 8.0 beta status 
In-reply-to: <200408150317.i7F3H0g25718@candle.pha.pa.us> 
References: <200408150317.i7F3H0g25718@candle.pha.pa.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
	message dated "Sat, 14 Aug 2004 23:17:00 -0400"
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 23:46:13 -0400
Message-ID: <15858.1092541573@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200408/885
X-Sequence-Number: 57854

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> However, I don't see any CVS commit that fixed this?  What am I missing?

The failure case is where the template database has a conflicting
table.  You didn't show us where you created that table, but it
evidently was not in template1.

			regards, tom lane