X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1270BD1DD2C for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:46:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72897-06 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:45:56 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4CFD1DF1F for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:45:47 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i1AGjg7S015994; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:45:42 -0500 (EST) To: "Dan Langille" Cc: Bruce Momjian , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PATH no longer a part of 7.4? In-reply-to: <4028C2B1.17785.1A30B32C@localhost> References: <4028B3E3.10865.19F6DF63@localhost> <4028C2B1.17785.1A30B32C@localhost> Comments: In-reply-to "Dan Langille" message dated "Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:38:25 -0500" Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:45:42 -0500 Message-ID: <15993.1076431542@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/11 X-Sequence-Number: 2266 "Dan Langille" writes: > Hmmm, for a 7.2 user, is there any solution? Apart from "drop type > path"? We'd rather not rename the table. Upgrade, or rename the path type to something else. (Not sure if there are any bad consequences of renaming the path type. It'd probably be a bad idea to do so if the database is making any actual use of the path type, just because of potential confusion.) regards, tom lane