pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode
4+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

Commits from this thread:
  2019-09-30 ce734aaec1 ca0b382850  Doc: improve PREPARE documentation, cross-referencing to plan_cache_mode.
* PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode
@ 2019-09-30 15:55 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
  2019-09-30 16:05 ` Re: PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread

From: Bruce Momjian @ 2019-09-30 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-docs

Our current docs have this text for PREPARE:

       Prepared statements can use generic plans rather than re-planning
       with each set of supplied EXECUTE values. This occurs immediately
       for prepared statements with no parameters; otherwise it occurs
       only after five or more executions produce plans whose estimated
       cost average (including planning overhead) is more expensive than
       the generic plan cost estimate. Once a generic plan is chosen, it
       is used for the remaining lifetime of the prepared statement. Using
       EXECUTE values which are rare in columns with many duplicates can
       generate custom plans that are so much cheaper than the generic
       plan, even after adding planning overhead, that the generic plan
       might never be used.

There is no mention that PG 12's plan_cache_mode can modify this
behavior.  I think this needs a doc patch.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode
  2019-09-30 15:55 PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
@ 2019-09-30 16:05 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  2019-09-30 16:47   ` Re: PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2019-09-30 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Our current docs have this text for PREPARE:
>        Prepared statements can use generic plans rather than re-planning
>        with each set of supplied EXECUTE values. This occurs immediately
>        for prepared statements with no parameters; otherwise it occurs
>        only after five or more executions produce plans whose estimated
>        cost average (including planning overhead) is more expensive than
>        the generic plan cost estimate. Once a generic plan is chosen, it
>        is used for the remaining lifetime of the prepared statement. Using
>        EXECUTE values which are rare in columns with many duplicates can
>        generate custom plans that are so much cheaper than the generic
>        plan, even after adding planning overhead, that the generic plan
>        might never be used.

> There is no mention that PG 12's plan_cache_mode can modify this
> behavior.  I think this needs a doc patch.

Yeah, agreed.  I can do it, or do you want to?

			regards, tom lane





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode
  2019-09-30 15:55 PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
  2019-09-30 16:05 ` Re: PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
@ 2019-09-30 16:47   ` Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
  2019-09-30 17:18     ` Re: PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread

From: Bruce Momjian @ 2019-09-30 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:05:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Our current docs have this text for PREPARE:
> >        Prepared statements can use generic plans rather than re-planning
> >        with each set of supplied EXECUTE values. This occurs immediately
> >        for prepared statements with no parameters; otherwise it occurs
> >        only after five or more executions produce plans whose estimated
> >        cost average (including planning overhead) is more expensive than
> >        the generic plan cost estimate. Once a generic plan is chosen, it
> >        is used for the remaining lifetime of the prepared statement. Using
> >        EXECUTE values which are rare in columns with many duplicates can
> >        generate custom plans that are so much cheaper than the generic
> >        plan, even after adding planning overhead, that the generic plan
> >        might never be used.
> 
> > There is no mention that PG 12's plan_cache_mode can modify this
> > behavior.  I think this needs a doc patch.
> 
> Yeah, agreed.  I can do it, or do you want to?

Uh, I am feeling I can't do anything with the tree until Friday because
of the PG 12 packaging, right?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode
  2019-09-30 15:55 PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
  2019-09-30 16:05 ` Re: PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  2019-09-30 16:47   ` Re: PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
@ 2019-09-30 17:18     ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2019-09-30 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:05:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, agreed.  I can do it, or do you want to?

> Uh, I am feeling I can't do anything with the tree until Friday because
> of the PG 12 packaging, right?

There's not a freeze on docs, as far as I'm concerned.  I'm working
on it right now.

			regards, tom lane





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-30 17:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-30 15:55 PREPARE and GUC plan_cache_mode Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
2019-09-30 16:05 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2019-09-30 16:47   ` Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
2019-09-30 17:18     ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox