Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C439FC79C for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:23:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32761-03 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:23:43 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EE39FC760 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:23:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9PFNjMQ016354; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:23:45 -0400 (EDT) To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Example non-Latin words for text search parser docs? In-reply-to: <20071025145522.GC16947@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <28960.1192998593@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20071025131224.GI5661@alvh.no-ip.org> <14426.1193320718@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200710251641.43143.peter_e@gmx.net> <20071025145522.GC16947@alvh.no-ip.org> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:55:22 -0300" Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:23:45 -0400 Message-ID: <16353.1193325825@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/85 X-Sequence-Number: 4506 Alvaro Herrera writes: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, 25. Oktober 2007 schrieb Tom Lane: >>> Hmm ... I went and looked at the page on developer.postgresql.org, >>> and it's just as I feared: with slightly bleary morning eyes, the >>> accents over the i's are not obvious, and so you have to look *real* >>> close before you get the point of the examples. >> >> By that standard, you will have to use non-Latin letters, which might decrease >> the usability of the examples much more. There are not likely to be any >> Latin-looking letters that are not ASCII and are not resembling another Latin >> letter. > I think it would suffice to use an accent over a vowel that's not an i. Yeah, that would help. But the real problem with pol?tico-militar is that it looks way too much like the English equivalent --- my first reaction was "huh, he forgot the 'y'". I'm after a word that *looks* not-English. Alvaro's comment that maybe we need to look to something besides Spanish seems on point. regards, tom lane