From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: louis.xwkuang@gmail.com
cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Minor typo in sentence saving visits to heap
In-reply-to: <167063189511.1901.8332207519290487949@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
References: <167063189511.1901.8332207519290487949@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
Comments: In-reply-to PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
	message dated "Sat, 10 Dec 2022 00:24:55 +0000"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1637130.1670768499.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 09:21:39 -0500
Message-ID: <1637131.1670768499@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1637131.1670768499%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> In the documentation on
> https://www.postgresql.org/account/comments/new/15/indexes-multicolumn.html/
> Constraints on columns to the right of these columns are checked in the
> index, so they save visits to the table proper, but they do not reduce the
> portion of the index that has to be scanned. 

> "so they save visits to the table proper" should be "so they save visits to
> the table heap".

Doesn't seem like an improvement from here, especially not with one
eye on the non-heap table AMs that are being worked on.

			regards, tom lane