Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EF5475DFD for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:41:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g1MEf7S16587; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:41:07 -0500 (EST) To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Vince Vielhaber , Peter Eisentraut , PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: Formatted man pages In-reply-to: <200202221259.g1MCx1a20684@candle.pha.pa.us> References: <200202221259.g1MCx1a20684@candle.pha.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:59:00 -0500" Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:41:07 -0500 Message-ID: <16584.1014388867@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200202/43 X-Sequence-Number: 1272 Bruce Momjian writes: > thought the postgresql-7.2.tar.gz had everything, including HTML. At > least I think it should. Certainly, and it does. > So, it has the man pages and HTML files? OK, I see now, the man pages > are in the base tarball postgresql-base-7.2.tar.gz, so they don't need > to be in the doc tarball. Now, I really do get it. I thought the item under discussion was which split-tarball file should contain the prebuilt doc files. To me, putting 'em in -docs makes much more sense than putting them in -base, for both HTML and man-page files. So I think your complaint was legit, if poorly worded. regards, tom lane