Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1389632E69
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  6 Apr 2009 17:29:14 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 53344-08 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  6 Apr 2009 17:29:09 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B778632886
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Mon,  6 Apr 2009 17:29:12 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n36KTBvP016749;
	Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:29:11 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: log_min_duration_statement units 
In-reply-to: <200904061954.n36JshH07215@momjian.us> 
References: <200904061954.n36JshH07215@momjian.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
	message dated "Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:54:43 -0400"
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:29:10 -0400
Message-ID: <16747.1239049750@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.116 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.116
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200904/12
X-Sequence-Number: 5100

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> It seems illogical to document it this way

Yeah, that's what I thought, so why did you do it that way?
You could do something like

#log_min_duration_statement = -1        # -1 is disabled, 0 logs all statements
                                        # default unit is ms


			regards, tom lane