Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3874C1337B93
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:56:44 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 68585-01-7 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:56:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312AA1337C21
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:56:25 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p1MGuIok001708;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:56:18 -0500 (EST)
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>,
	Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS 
In-reply-to: <201102221407.p1ME7dA17560@momjian.us> 
References: <201102221407.p1ME7dA17560@momjian.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
	message dated "Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:07:39 -0500"
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:56:18 -0500
Message-ID: <1707.1298393778@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201102/76
X-Sequence-Number: 6424

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> I found a way to reword the paragraph to be clearer about its purpose:

It would still be a good idea to mention which views have the issue.
If you're not certain you know them all, you could use weasel wording
like "Views affected by this issue include foo, bar, and baz".

			regards, tom lane