pg.ddx.io pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedSavepoint
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Savepoint
@ 2024-10-18 06:50 PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: PG Doc comments form @ 2024-10-18 06:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; +Cc: splarv@ya.ru
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/sql-insert.html
Description:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/sql-insert.html#SQL-ON-CONFLICT
In section on conflict nothing that there will be implicit savepoint (sub
transaction). But this is important to know to mark function as PARALLEL
UNSAFE.
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Savepoint
@ 2024-10-18 10:25 Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
parent: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Laurenz Albe @ 2024-10-18 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: splarv@ya.ru; pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 06:50 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/sql-insert.html#SQL-ON-CONFLICT
>
> In section on conflict nothing that there will be implicit savepoint (sub
> transaction). But this is important to know to mark function as PARALLEL
> UNSAFE.
What makes you think that INSERT ... ON CONFLICT takes a savepoint?
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-18 10:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-10-18 06:50 Savepoint PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
2024-10-18 10:25 ` Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox