pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Hyperlink to Logical replication slots instead of physical
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Hyperlink to Logical replication slots instead of physical
@ 2025-04-12 16:44 PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
  2025-04-15 07:39 ` Re: Hyperlink to Logical replication slots instead of physical Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread

From: PG Doc comments form @ 2025-04-12 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; +Cc: divyamodernite@gmail.com

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/logical-replication-subscription.html
Description:

I think there is a mistake in this doc :
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/logical-replication-subscription.html

"Each subscription will receive changes via one replication slot (see
Section 26.2.6)."

The above statement actually links to the physical replication slots, which
is different. Should it not link to this instead? :
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/logicaldecoding-explanation.html#LOGICALDECODING-REPLICATION...


^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Hyperlink to Logical replication slots instead of physical
  2025-04-12 16:44 Hyperlink to Logical replication slots instead of physical PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
@ 2025-04-15 07:39 ` Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread

From: Daniel Gustafsson @ 2025-04-15 07:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: divyamodernite@gmail.com; pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org

> On 12 Apr 2025, at 18:44, PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
> 
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> 
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/logical-replication-subscription.html
> Description:
> 
> I think there is a mistake in this doc :
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/logical-replication-subscription.html
> 
> "Each subscription will receive changes via one replication slot (see
> Section 26.2.6)."
> 
> The above statement actually links to the physical replication slots, which
> is different. Should it not link to this instead? :
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/logicaldecoding-explanation.html#LOGICALDECODING-REPLICATION...

Agreed, that seems like the right change.  Unless objected to I'll apply the
attached diff with the appropriate level of backpatching.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

Attachments:

  [application/octet-stream] replication_slot.diff (639B, ../../9E0F9EFE-105D-44B2-9C24-A280E32415CC@yesql.se/2-replication_slot.diff)
  download | inline diff:
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml
index f288c049a5c..d305b272208 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@
 
   <para>
    Each subscription will receive changes via one replication slot (see
-   <xref linkend="streaming-replication-slots"/>).  Additional replication
+   <xref linkend="logicaldecoding-replication-slots"/>).  Additional replication
    slots may be required for the initial data synchronization of
    pre-existing table data and those will be dropped at the end of data
    synchronization.

^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-15 07:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-12 16:44 Hyperlink to Logical replication slots instead of physical PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
2025-04-15 07:39 ` Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox