Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kFexh-0008SM-0N for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:51:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kFexf-0002CA-Vx for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:51:07 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kFexf-0002C3-Qh for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:51:07 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kFexa-0008M0-NY for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:51:06 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 088Eoxm11767184; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:50:59 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Magnus Hagander cc: "David G. Johnston" , Pg Docs Subject: Re: Installation instructions vs binaries In-reply-to: References: <1763586.1599573981@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1764488.1599575253@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:33:42 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1767182.1599576659.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 10:50:59 -0400 Message-ID: <1767183.1599576659@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Magnus Hagander writes: > I think we're talking about a different repetitiveness. If I apply Davids > suggestion to that patch, then instead of: > + > + If you are using a pre-packaged version > + of PostgreSQL, it may well have a specific > + convention for where to place the data directory, and it may also > + provide a script for creating the data directory. In that case you > It would say something like > Pre-packaged versions of PostgreSQL may have a specific convention.... > (rest unchanged). [ shrug... ] Well, I wrote that text, so naturally I like it the way it is ;-). Perhaps a neutral observer would like the shorter version better, not sure. But I think pluralizing "versions" is going to make it harder to construct the rest of the sentence non-ambiguously. You really only want to be talking about one data directory location and one wrapper script. regards, tom lane