X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A639FB20A for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:30:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25453-02 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:29:52 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042FA9FB207 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:29:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8KKTmTF018460; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:29:48 -0400 (EDT) To: Bruce Momjian cc: Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: This approach to non-ASCII names does not work In-reply-to: <200609202025.k8KKPVI12425@momjian.us> References: <200609202025.k8KKPVI12425@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:25:31 -0400" Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:29:48 -0400 Message-ID: <18459.1158784188@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.101 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200609/23 X-Sequence-Number: 3710 Bruce Momjian writes: > Yes, I use them where possible. I use: > http://www.mountaindragon.com/html/iso.htm ... which says right on it that it considers only ISO 8859/1 and is not a complete list even of that set. I assume that somewhere there is a Web-related spec of the widely recognized entity names, but I see no reason to suppose that this list is it. Something at w3c, say, would have a tad more credibility. regards, tom lane