X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B107AD1C4BD for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2003 02:49:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89998-03 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 23:47:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FADD1C4BF for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 23:48:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h722n1Q3018495; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 22:49:01 -0400 (EDT) To: "Chad N. Tindel" Cc: "scott.marlowe" , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls In-reply-to: <20030801205110.GA63709@calma.pair.com> References: <20030801163555.GA32496@calma.pair.com> <20030801205110.GA63709@calma.pair.com> Comments: In-reply-to "Chad N. Tindel" message dated "Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:51:11 -0400" Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 22:49:01 -0400 Message-ID: <18494.1059792541@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200308/7 X-Sequence-Number: 1867 "Chad N. Tindel" writes: > As a programmer, I personally would never write code that kept > people from running things as root. I mean, what is the point? If someone roots your box, it's not our fault. Simple as that. Personally, I wish more net-accessible servers were written with that philosophy. The correct question is NEVER "why can't I run this as root?". The correct question is ALWAYS "how can I avoid running this as root? And if I can't avoid it, why not?". Any other approach leads to Outlook Express. (BTW, have you forgotten the SQL Server worm already?) regards, tom lane