Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162EB632CEA for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:28:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63747-01 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:28:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90A16323BD for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:28:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o7TGS6iN018773; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:28:06 -0400 (EDT) To: "Kevin Grittner" cc: "Thom Brown" , "Dave Page" , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, "Erik Rijkers" Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting In-reply-to: <4C7A320D0200002500034DAE@gw.wicourts.gov> References: <4C7558140200002500034BE5@gw.wicourts.gov> <1282778956.11634.585.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com> <4C760112.807@lelarge.info> <1282842211.17406.6.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com> <4C765CB60200002500034C39@gw.wicourts.gov> <1282844645.17406.10.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com> <4C7797830200002500034D17@gw.wicourts.gov> <4C779D190200002500034D25@gw.wicourts.gov> <4584901efda1964b96528c7637a5f20d! .squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> { h@ <4C7A320D0200002500034DAE@gw.wicourts.gov> Comments: In-reply-to "Kevin Grittner" message dated "Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:10:21 -0500" Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:28:06 -0400 Message-ID: <18772.1283099286@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.618 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FU_COMMON_SUBS2=0.292, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201008/129 X-Sequence-Number: 5953 "Kevin Grittner" writes: > Thom Brown wrote: >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/dark_ixion/4937010683/sizes/o/ > For me, that's the easiest to read so far. With a lot of the other > distractions cleaned up, I wonder if it's worth throwing another > version up with subtle shadows on the boxes which have rounded > corners. I think that glitzes things up enough to make it more > pleasing visually, without really distracting me. Of course if its > distracting enough for anyone to annoy or detract from usability > then they don't belong -- I just wonder if they might have > previously been seen as distracting largely because of they were > next to all those eye-grabbing colors.... The yellow "note" boxes still strike me as too eye-grabbing for their purpose. Otherwise this version seems nice. regards, tom lane