From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>
cc: PG Docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT
In-reply-to: <5224AF98.9000905@dalibo.com>
References: <52244B75.6040507@dalibo.com> <15351.1378133409@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <5224AF98.9000905@dalibo.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>
 message dated "Mon, 02 Sep 2013 17:32:40 +0200"
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 12:43:45 -0400
Message-ID: <18778.1378140225@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org

Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com> writes:
> On 09/02/2013 04:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com> writes:
>>> Is there a reason, besides simple oversight, that commit
>>> 073d7cb513f5de44530f4bdbaaa4b5d4cce5f984 was not backpatched?

>> AFAICS, it was.

> That does seem to indicate it was.  But it doesn't seem they made it to
> the website:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-altertable.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-altertable.html

The website has the docs as of the latest releases, and we've not issued
any new minor releases since April.  (Yeah, we're overdue.)

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs