X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC7FD1B542 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:52:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27339-06 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:51:44 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E90D1B4CF for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:51:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBIEpc19019494; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:51:39 -0500 (EST) To: "Peter Eisentraut" Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: My SGML build fixed In-reply-to: <35406.137.226.116.82.1071738232.squirrel@new.host.name> References: <200312180102.50115.peter_e@gmx.net> <200312180015.hBI0FCA26136@candle.pha.pa.us> <35406.137.226.116.82.1071738232.squirrel@new.host.name> Comments: In-reply-to "Peter Eisentraut" message dated "Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:03:52 +0100" Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:51:38 -0500 Message-ID: <19493.1071759098@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200312/48 X-Sequence-Number: 2208 "Peter Eisentraut" writes: > Right now it just seems like a waste of resources and it confuses the > onlookers. If Bruce is willing to expend the resources, what's the problem? I kinda like having some redundancy in this service, myself. regards, tom lane