X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B7914B2820 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 17:39:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54085-05 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 20:39:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7BB14B27FF for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 17:39:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i79KdhWd019662; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 16:39:43 -0400 (EDT) To: Jeff Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Suggestion on reorganizing functions In-reply-to: <6B84FBA0-EA28-11D8-A672-000D9366F0C4@torgo.978.org> References: <6B84FBA0-EA28-11D8-A672-000D9366F0C4@torgo.978.org> Comments: In-reply-to Jeff message dated "Mon, 09 Aug 2004 13:20:33 -0400" Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:39:43 -0400 Message-ID: <19661.1092083983@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/22 X-Sequence-Number: 2482 Jeff writes: > One idea to solve it would to have the flat list link to > functions-foo.html#FOOBAR - this would allow both methods of > organization and only having function definitions in one spot. Basically what you're proposing is an index. I am not sure if DocBook could handle generating an index covering just functions, or if we'd have to merge it with the general index. If the latter then it's pretty much done already. (We may have missed indexing some function descriptions, but certainly a lot of them have an index entry.) regards, tom lane