Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAFN8Rm60179 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 18:08:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAFN7Sc19742; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 18:07:28 -0500 (EST) To: Roland Roberts cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org, Josh Berkus Subject: Cross-posting (was Re: PL/pgSQL examples NOT involving functions) In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Roland Roberts message dated "15 Nov 2001 16:21:33 -0500" Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 18:07:28 -0500 Message-ID: <19739.1005865648@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200111/231 X-Sequence-Number: 5613 Roland Roberts writes: > "Josh" == Josh Berkus writes: > Josh> Please do not cross-post to multiple lists. > Hmm, there were some complaints recently on the hackers list about > things being posted on only one list. While it's easy to overdo cross-posting, I don't regard it as inherently a bad thing. May I suggest (again) that folks who are subscribed to multiple PG lists should select the "unique" subscription mode? If you're set up that way then you only get one copy of cross-posted messages, and everyone is happy. It's been awhile since I did this, but I think sending set ALL unique to the majordomo server does the trick. regards, tom lane