Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (maillist@s5-03.ppp.op.net [209.152.195.67]) by hub.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA00619 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 12:54:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from maillist@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from maillist@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) id MAA07113; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 12:54:11 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <199901071754.MAA07113@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [DOCS] Upcoming Attractions, web site In-Reply-To: <3694DDF3.5943D3E5@alumni.caltech.edu> from "Thomas G. Lockhart" at "Jan 7, 1999 4:16:51 pm" To: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu (Thomas G. Lockhart) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 12:54:11 -0500 (EST) Cc: hal@enteract.com, docs@postgreSQL.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL47 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Looks nice. Might rephrase: > > Those of you who did not like > our table-level locking will be pleasantly surprised. > > to be something like > > Those of you wanting alternatives to > our table-level locking will be pleasantly surprised. I don't like the new wording. It sounds like we are adding an optional functionality, while we are replacing table-level locking because MVCC is much better. We can say: Those of you need better locking than our current table-level locking will be pleasantly surprised. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026