From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-Id: <199902011919.OAA23705@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] [WEBMASTER] 'www/html main.html'
In-Reply-To: <m107Old-000EBPC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de> from Jan Wieck at
	"Feb 1, 1999  8:12:16 pm"
To: jwieck@debis.com
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 14:19:31 -0500 (EST)
Cc: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu, momjian@hub.org, hackers@postgreSQL.org,
	docs@postgreSQL.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> > OK, got to finish temp table and commit them first.
> 
>     Don't know if you noticed my statement in another thread.
> 
>     I  think temp tables could confuse any function that uses the
>     prepared/saved  plan  feature  of  SPI  manager.  If  such  a
>     function  called  once  saved  a  plan for a temp table named
>     'test', and later called again  but  'test'  is  now  another
>     table, probably the parsetree and plan might point to the old
>     (wrong, not anymore existent) table.

Yes.  There are going to be limitations to the temp tables.  Not sure
how what the limitations are going to be..


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026