Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (root@s5-03.ppp.op.net [209.152.195.67]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA06856; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 19:01:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from maillist@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from maillist@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) id SAA29805; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 18:37:49 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <199911082337.SAA29805@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [DOCS] 6.5.3 diff In-Reply-To: <38275B14.691F4E38@wgcr.org> from Lamar Owen at "Nov 8, 1999 06:21:56 pm" To: Lamar Owen Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 18:37:49 -0500 (EST) CC: The Hermit Hacker , Peter Eisentraut , webmaster@postgreSQL.org, PostgreSQL-documentation X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL65 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > Not what program, what set of arguments for the diff command...no matter > > what I seem to try, someone doesn't like the patch :) > > There's so many different arguments.... 'diff -uNr postgresql-6.5.x.orig > postgresql-6.5.x' works for me, and is what I use in preparing the > patchsets for the RPM's. Of course, that presupposes that there is a > whole '.orig' tree laying around to diff against, but I fugre that's a > given. > While we are on the topic, can someone explain why unified diffs are better than context diffs. I find unified diffs hard to read. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026