Received: from henry.newn.cam.ac.uk (henry.newn.cam.ac.uk [131.111.204.130]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA30054 for ; Thu, 11 May 2000 06:53:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk) Received: from [131.111.204.180] (helo=quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk) by henry.newn.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12pqao-00012X-00; Thu, 11 May 2000 11:53:22 +0100 Received: from prlw1 by quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12pqah-0003Vk-00; Thu, 11 May 2000 11:53:15 +0100 Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 11:53:15 +0100 From: Patrick Welche To: The Hermit Hacker Cc: PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: Patches list broken? Message-ID: <20000511115315.C13404@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk> References: <29172.958024317@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.1i In-Reply-To: <29172.958024317@sss.pgh.pa.us>; from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us on Thu, May 11, 2000 at 01:51:57AM -0400 X-Archive-Number: 200005/683 On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 01:51:57AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > The Hermit Hacker writes: > > i don't have you subscribed to -patches > > > On Wed, 10 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> Did anyone see this patch? I sure didn't. I see it in the patches > >> archive, but did not receive the e-mail. > > I do not recall seeing it either, and I most certainly *was* subscribed > to -patches ... since Bruce is generally agreed to be our lead > patch-applier, I'd be more than a little startled to hear that he hasn't > been subscribed there ... so it sounds like majordomo has dropped some > subscriptions :-(. Do you have auto-drop-on-any-bounce features > enabled? I certainly used to be on patches, never unsubscribed, but have also never received a single mail from said list since the move to majordomo 2... Patrick