Received: from mail.postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id eBU4NZL75843
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 23:23:35 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org)
Received: from sraigw.sra.co.jp (sraigw.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.2])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBU38DL66607;
	Fri, 29 Dec 2000 22:08:13 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from t-ishii@sra.co.jp)
Received: from sranhk.sra.co.jp (sranhk [133.137.36.134])
	by sraigw.sra.co.jp (8.8.7/3.7W-sraigw) with ESMTP id MAA04757;
	Sat, 30 Dec 2000 12:08:11 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (IDENT:t-ishii@portsv3-20 [133.137.84.20])
	by sranhk.sra.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-srambox) with ESMTP id MAA31045;
	Sat, 30 Dec 2000 12:08:06 +0900
To: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
Cc: cch@cc.kmu.edu.tw, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET
	CLIENT_ENCODING"
In-Reply-To: <200012291900.OAA16219@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <3A49D8C3.5498BA62@cc.kmu.edu.tw>
	<200012291900.OAA16219@candle.pha.pa.us>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1
	=?iso-2022-jp?B?KBskQjAqGyhCKQ==?=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20001230120759M.t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 12:07:59 +0900
From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140)
Lines: 9
X-Archive-Number: 200012/77
X-Sequence-Number: 124

> We have merged README.mb into the official SGML docs, so the file is
> gone.  Not sure what setup we have for SGML docs in different languages.

Even if the Big5 version of README.mb could be included in our SGML
docs, I don't think sgml tools could process Big5 without any problem
due to the nature of the encoding(probably ok for EUC-TW or
UTF-8). What about placing it as doc/README.mb.big5 or whatever?
--
Tatsuo Ishii