From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-Id: <200101241633.LAA00867@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101241728570.1469-100000@peter.localdomain>
	"from Peter Eisentraut at Jan 24, 2001 05:31:14 pm"
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:33:26 -0500 (EST)
CC: Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>, Edwin Martin <e.j.martin@chello.nl>,
	pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org,
	PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

> > Oh, thanks.  Seems we are better leaving the FAQ's in there because they
> > are changed so often as copies from CVS.
> 
> The FAQs should be handled the same as the documentation proper, i.e.,
> there should be one copy in the devel-corner reflecting current sources
> and one copy in the users-lounge reflecting earlier releases.  Lots of
> these have changed for 7.1, but that doesn't help those using 7.0 right
> now.
> 
> FAQ is a stupid name anyway.  Additional installation hints is better.
> 

I usually make the FAQ change during late beta, and mark stuff as 7.1
anyway.  The TODO list should be updated constantly because it marks
stuff that will be done in the next release.  I don't see an issue here.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026