Received: from quillandmouse.com (tamqfl1-ar4-076-029.dsl.gtei.net [4.41.76.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1H7ebx44271 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 02:40:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from paulf@quillandmouse.com) Received: from paulf by quillandmouse.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14U1zu-0001JK-00 for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 02:41:38 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 02:41:38 -0500 From: Paul M Foster To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle vs DB2 vs MySQL - Which should I use? Message-ID: <20010217024138.D4105@quillandmouse.com> References: <20010216091241.A30356@rakete.joerdens.de> <200102161436.JAA08966@candle.pha.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200102161436.JAA08966@candle.pha.pa.us>; from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us on Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 09:36:23AM -0500 X-Archive-Number: 200102/857 X-Sequence-Number: 4769 On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 09:36:23AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Funny you should mention PHP. I talked to Rasmus about the email volume > when I first met him in the fall. He said the volume of email is so > great that just reading the subject lines takes a long time. > > We aren't there yet, but we are heading in that direction. One thing > some of us have done are to take full-time jobs with PostgreSQL so we > can handle the increased load. Second, I have started to skip emails > with subjects that contain obvious questions, relying on other users to > answer these. When several people post on the easy question, I start to > suspect there is some issue there and start reading. > This could eventually be handled the way they do with Usenet lists. When the volume finally gets too high, split the lists into more specialized sub-lists. (Though obviously you want to continue to improve the docs as well.) The busiest list I was ever on was the debian-help list. This one might be even busier. Paul