Received: from mail.postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f1N2gAx52232 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:42:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org) Received: from mail.netic.de (mail.s.netic.de [212.9.160.11]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1J1hFx84734; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 20:43:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from eschmid+sic@mail.netic.de) Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.111/mail.s.netic.de) via LF.net GmbH Internet Services for mail.postgresql.org id m14UfLi-001WyUC; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 02:42:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20010219024246.42821@s.netic.de> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 02:42:46 +0100 From: eschmid+sic@s.netic.de To: Christopher Kings-Lynne , pgsql-general@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle vs DB2 vs MySQL - Which should I use? Reply-To: eschmid@php.net References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Christopher Kings-Lynne on Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:24:59AM +0800 X-Archive-Number: 200102/120 X-Sequence-Number: 378 On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:24:59AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > Aside from persuading more people to spend time answering email > > > questions, I agree we need to work harder on making answers findable > > > outside the mailing lists. Improving the docs, making the mail archives > > > more easily searchable, etc etc. I dunno if an "annotated manual" would > > > help --- I've never used one --- but if people want to try one, it can't > > > hurt. The main problem is to get the work done. We need volunteers to > > > actually do some of these things, not just suggest them ... > > Maybe the PHP.net people would be kind enough to allow you guys to use their > annotated manual software... Be careful, it is based on MySQL :) -Egon -- http://www.linuxtag.de/ http://php.net/books.php http://www.concert-band.de/ http://www.php-buch.de/