Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1JI2bx93428 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:02:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) id NAA10972; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:02:33 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200102191802.NAA10972@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: Section numbering In-Reply-To: "from Peter Eisentraut at Feb 19, 2001 07:03:53 pm" To: Peter Eisentraut Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:02:32 -0500 (EST) CC: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL77 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200102/109 X-Sequence-Number: 367 Numbers Look good to me. > Does anyone mind if I turn on section numbering? I.e., instead of > > 9. Multi-Version Concurrency Control > Introduction > Transaction Isolation > Read Committed Isolation Level > Serializable Isolation Level > Data consistency checks at the application level > Locking and Tables > Table-level locks > Row-level locks > Locking and Indices > > We'd have > > 9. Multi-Version Concurrency Control > 9.1 Introduction > 9.2 Transaction Isolation > 9.3 Read Committed Isolation Level > 9.4 Serializable Isolation Level > 9.5 Data consistency checks at the application level > 9.6 Locking and Tables > 9.6.1 Table-level locks > 9.6.2 Row-level locks > 9.7 Locking and Indices > > This makes for easier reference, and the cross-reference links look a lot > less tacky (no longer "see the section called "Locking and Indices"). > > -- > Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/ > > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026