Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f272wkx47962 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 21:58:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) id VAA26118; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 21:51:38 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200103070251.VAA26118@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: PL/SQL-to-PL/pgSQL-HOWTO In-Reply-To: <3AA581A3.A783866C@alumni.caltech.edu> "from Thomas Lockhart at Mar 7, 2001 00:32:35 am" To: thomas@pgsql.com Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 21:51:38 -0500 (EST) CC: Roberto Mello , Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL77 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200103/40 X-Sequence-Number: 471 > > Also, when is the deadline to submit documentation for the PG team? > > With all the WAL fuss going on the hackers list it maybe at least one more > > week? > > I ask because I'd really like to revamp the PL/pgSQL docs, make it > > much more detailed, with more examples, and better divisions. But I've > > been swamped with school work. But next week is spring break so I'd have > > time to work on it. > > What do you say? > > Peter, is this OK with you? It will go into the programmer's doc, and we > can freeze that a bit later than some others. It is OK with me. Until > March 16? That's great. Seems we really need PlPgSQL docs beefed up, and this will do that for us. I seem to remember Peter liking this idea too. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026