Received: from fslc.usu.edu (fslc.usu.edu [129.123.2.40])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2G13Xx94064
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 20:03:33 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from rmello@fslc.usu.edu)
Received: (from rmello@localhost)
	by fslc.usu.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3/Debian 8.11.2-1) id f2G13T016450
	for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:03:29 -0700
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:03:29 -0700
From: Roberto Mello <rmello@cc.usu.edu>
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Are <sect3>'s displayed in TOCs?
Message-ID: <20010315180329.A16436@cc.usu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
X-Archive-Number: 200103/70
X-Sequence-Number: 503

	I am almost done with the PL/pgSQL doc revamping.

	Are <sect3>'s displayed in tables of contents? I have <sect3>s that
would be much more appealing and useful to readers if they were displayed
in the TOCs.
	If <sect3>'s won't be displayed, would it be ok for me to re-structure
some PL/pgSQL topics into <sect1>s with <sect2>s ?

	-Roberto
-- 
+----| http://fslc.usu.edu USU Free Software & GNU/Linux Club|------+
  Roberto Mello - Computer Science, USU - http://www.brasileiro.net 
      http://www.sdl.usu.edu - Space Dynamics Lab, Web Developer    
Why trying to DRINK and DRIVE, while you can SMOKE and FLY?