Received: from sraigw.sra.co.jp (sraigw.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.2]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2NF6ew01883 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:06:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from t-ishii@sra.co.jp) Received: from sranhk.sra.co.jp (sranhk [133.137.36.134]) by sraigw.sra.co.jp (8.8.7/3.7W-sraigw) with ESMTP id AAA14906 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 00:06:35 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (IDENT:t-ishii@portsv3-5 [133.137.84.5]) by sranhk.sra.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-srambox) with ESMTP id AAA24130; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 00:06:31 +0900 To: lockhart@fourpalms.org, lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu Cc: peter_e@gmx.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Re: 7.1 docs In-Reply-To: <3ABB62F5.56C963C3@alumni.caltech.edu> References: <20010323175044L.t-ishii@sra.co.jp> <3ABB62F5.56C963C3@alumni.caltech.edu> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 =?iso-2022-jp?B?KBskQjAqGyhCKQ==?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010324000605B.t-ishii@sra.co.jp> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 00:06:05 +0900 From: Tatsuo Ishii X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 22 X-Archive-Number: 200103/1189 X-Sequence-Number: 6538 > > I have a plan to translate 7.1 docs into Japanases and I looked around > > current docs. I noticed that contacts.sgml and ref/current*.sgml are > > not used anywhere in the result html nor in man pages. > > Does anybody know the reason? Or am I missing something? > > I put in contacts.sgml a *long* time ago, thinking that something like > it should be in the docs. But it was not complete enough to consider > including at the time (now that I look, it only has my name ;), so it > was only a placeholder for the future. > > We could take it out altogether if we want. Peter? > > The ref/current_{date,time...}.sgml files are there because (a) > functions should be documented, and (b) someone documented them. But we > never documented enough functions to justify setting up an entire > section of a manual to cover them. I think that these are more likely to > be used in the future, but we do need additional pages written covering > other functions. Oh I see. Thanks for the explanation. -- Tatsuo Ishii