Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f69CVQa38415; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:31:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f69CVGk16384; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:31:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200107091231.f69CVGk16384@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: QUERY - Including the new LDP PostgreSQL HOWTO in the main PostgreSQL distribution In-Reply-To: <3B49334C.86984B29@postgresql.org> "from Justin Clift at Jul 9, 2001 02:30:04 pm" To: Justin Clift Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:31:16 -0400 (EDT) CC: pgsql-general@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL90 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200107/10 X-Sequence-Number: 859 > Hi all, > > We've had the go-ahead from the Linux Documentation Project (LDP) guys > to create a new PostgreSQL HOW-TO for a while now. I was going to start > it off just to make sure we had something, so that it could be put > around instead of Al Dev's Database Guide (the bad one). > > Well, I haven't had time. Here's my thought, I'd like to know what > people think. > > - How about we create a new PostgreSQL HOW-TO, have it as part of the > main distribution, and have that be the one which the LDP guys use? > > They use DocBook format, as do we, and I feel this will allow us to keep > a very in-sync relationship between the new PostgreSQL HOW-TO and the > present version. > > It also means that no one person has total control of it, and it can be > contributed to by anyone that has a suggestion and/or can generate a > diff. I always wondered how a HOTTO differs from an FAQ or the existing docs. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026