Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f91IxPn49470 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:59:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id f91IwxH15681; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:58:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200110011858.f91IwxH15681@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes In-Reply-To: <3BB8BBFC.6E9CC364@fourpalms.org> "from Thomas Lockhart at Oct 1, 2001 06:54:52 pm" To: Thomas Lockhart Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:58:59 -0400 (EDT) CC: Vince Vielhaber , PostgreSQL-documentation X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL90 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200110/4 X-Sequence-Number: 1018 > >
  • SGML docs > > updated every half-hour > > Ya know, if I'm required to wait 12 hours for *any* source code build to > be available to my CVSup'd repository, why should we slap in a bunch of > short circuits for the docs? And if this is a valuable thing to do, why > short circuit the docs building procedure I've already got on the main > machines by pointing the web site off to some other machine? > > fwiw, one docs building procedure, either ~thomas's, or ~petere's new > one, or ~bruce's should be sufficient imho. > > Since we all seem to be heading off in different directions, we should > talk about why that is necessary and try to get headed somewhere > productively imho. I did it because the doc build was down and it was supposedly holding up beta. I do think we need more frequent doc builds than 24 hours though. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026