Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f924xCn13657 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 00:59:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id f924x4416871; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 00:59:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200110020459.f924x4416871@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes In-Reply-To: <20011001233901.M77860-100000@mail1.hub.org> "from Marc G. Fournier at Oct 1, 2001 11:40:09 pm" To: "Marc G. Fournier" Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 00:59:04 -0400 (EDT) CC: Thomas Lockhart , Vince Vielhaber , PostgreSQL-documentation X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL90 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200110/7 X-Sequence-Number: 1021 > > > Since we all seem to be heading off in different directions, we should > > > talk about why that is necessary and try to get headed somewhere > > > productively imho. > > > > I did it because the doc build was down and it was supposedly holding up > > beta. I do think we need more frequent doc builds than 24 hours though. > > Since when doe sa doc build, or docs of any kind, hold up beta? docs are > 'fluid' up until a week before release,as they have always been ... > > last I heard from petere, there were tools that need to be installed, and > were installed, ont eh server for the builds ... Peter, did I miss > something in that, or was it just waiting for ftp.postgresql.org to be on > the new server? Tom said we shouldn't go beta without the docs building. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026