Received: from mail1.hub.org (webmail.hub.org [216.126.85.1])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f92CaNn43680
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 08:36:23 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost)
	by mail1.hub.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f92CaF343665;
	Tue, 2 Oct 2001 08:36:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 08:36:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>,
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>,
	PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: CVS changes
In-Reply-To: <3BB8CDCA.1235F8A4@fourpalms.org>
Message-ID: <20011002083523.I77860-100000@mail1.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Archive-Number: 200110/125
X-Sequence-Number: 13867

On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> I would like to resolve the 12 hour lag for CVSup and anoncvs service,
> and frankly until that is resolved we should accept that we have a 12
> hour turnaround on most changes. Coincidentally, that is the rate at
> which the docs are (or would be, if I could figure out where they
> should go) currently built.

It should never have been 12hrs ... I had it set for 4 ... but, I have
drop'd it down to hourly effective this morning ...

> Let's stop trying to each build a new wheel; we have plenty enough
> already. There are fundamental breakages in the current servers, and
> until those are resolve I'm not happy that we are changing web site
> info etc to suggest workarounds as permanent solutions.

Agreed ...