Received: from mail1.hub.org (webmail.hub.org [216.126.85.1]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f92EIIn64739 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 10:18:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by mail1.hub.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f92EIGE64733; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 10:18:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 10:18:16 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Tom Lane cc: PostgreSQL Development Subject: Re: CVS changes In-Reply-To: <8102.1002029469@sss.pgh.pa.us> Message-ID: <20011002101752.L77860-100000@mail1.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200110/138 X-Sequence-Number: 13880 will set that one up next ... On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" writes: > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > >> I would like to resolve the 12 hour lag for CVSup and anoncvs service, > > > It should never have been 12hrs ... I had it set for 4 ... but, I have > > drop'd it down to hourly effective this morning ... > > That sounds like a good setting for anoncvs service. But I think Thomas > (and any other committers who use cvsup) still need a cvsup server > running on the master cvs machine. Even a 1-hour lag is too much when > you are trying to commit changes. > > regards, tom lane >