Received: from habanero.hesketh.net (habanero.hesketh.net [66.45.6.196]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAM4NRm84703 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:23:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from brent@mutt.rcfile.org) Received: from mutt.rcfile.org (rdu57-26-120.nc.rr.com [66.57.26.120]) by habanero.hesketh.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id fAM4NQU22129; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:23:26 -0500 X-Received-From: brent@mutt.rcfile.org X-Delivered-To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org X-Spam-Filter: check_local@habanero.hesketh.net by digitalanswers.org X-More-Information: http://spamfighter.hesketh.net Received: (from brent@localhost) by mutt.rcfile.org (8.11.6/8.11.5) id fAM4NeP29113; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:23:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from brent) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:23:39 -0500 From: Brent Verner To: Tom Lane Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: sgml cleanup Message-ID: <20011121232339.A28949@rcfile.org> References: <20011121224721.A28646@rcfile.org> <28119.1006402312@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <28119.1006402312@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Archive-Number: 200111/67 X-Sequence-Number: 1140 On 21 Nov 2001 at 23:11 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote: | Brent Verner writes: | > In trying to get the doc/ tree in cvs to build, I noticed a _lot_ of | > empty closing tags when I ran | | ?? I'm not seeing any of these problems. Are you using the recommended | docs toolchain? I have no clue about the recommended docs toolchain. I must not be, since my docbook2man-spec.pl does not (seem to) accept command line arguments. I've built postgresql.tar, but man.tar is still giving me fits. The built html files can be seen at http://rcfile.org/posthack/pgdocs/ What I am seeing from a fresh update (at 11:19 EST) is this. sleepy:~/pgsql/doc/src brent$ grep '' sgml/* |wc -l grep: sgml/CVS: Is a directory grep: sgml/ref: Is a directory 1639 sleepy:~/pgsql/doc/src brent$ grep -Hn '' sgml/xoper.sgml sgml/xoper.sgml:116: operators < and > for a particular data type are usually each others' sgml/xoper.sgml:117: commutators, and operator + is usually commutative with itself. sgml/xoper.sgml:118: But operator - is usually not commutative with anything. sgml/xoper.sgml:179: For example, < and >= are a negator pair for most data types. sgml/xoper.sgml:242: make sense if you think about it. = will typically accept only sgml/xoper.sgml:243: a small fraction of the rows in a table; <> will typically reject sgml/xoper.sgml:244: only a small fraction. < will accept a fraction that depends on sgml/xoper.sgml:248: <= will accept a slightly larger fraction than < for the same sgml/xoper.sgml:251: rough guess anyhow. Similar remarks apply to > and >=. sgml/xoper.sgml:359: joins. On machines that meet the IEEE floating point standard, minus sgml/xoper.sgml:389: that can only succeed for pairs of values that fall at the same place sgml/xoper.sgml:413: In practice you should only write SORT clauses for an = operator, sgml/xoper.sgml:414: and the two referenced operators should always be named <. Trying sgml/xoper.sgml:436: There must be < and > ordering operators having the same left and sgml/xoper.sgml:438: operators must be named < and >; you do confused, brent -- "Develop your talent, man, and leave the world something. Records are really gifts from people. To think that an artist would love you enough to share his music with anyone is a beautiful thing." -- Duane Allman