Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fBR4mjm47734 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 23:48:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id fBR4mgt05246; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 23:48:42 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200112270448.fBR4mgt05246@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: vs In-Reply-To: "from Peter Eisentraut at Nov 30, 2001 07:13:05 pm" To: Peter Eisentraut Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 23:48:42 -0500 (EST) CC: PostgreSQL-documentation X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL90 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200112/17 X-Sequence-Number: 1198 OK, Peter, can I clean these up? Seems like a quiet time to do that. Are applications things you interact with, like psql, while commands are things like grep and createdb? In reading the definition below, I thought PostgreSQL was an application, while psql and postmaster were both commands. You type psql and postmaster, but not PostgreSQL. That would fit with the WordPerfect comment. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > Can someone clarify when we should use and when we should use > > ? I see postmaster used with application, but psql and > > createdb used with command. Is this correct? > > >From "DocBook: The Definitive Guide": > > | Command -- The name of an executable program or other software command > | > | This element holds the name of an executable program or the text of a > | command that a user enters to execute a program. > > | Application -- The name of a software program > | > | The appelation "application" is usually reserved for larger software > | packages--WordPerfect, for example, but not grep. In some domains, > | Application may also apply to a piece of hardware. > > One could think of psql as a separate "application", but postmaster is > certainly a command only. > > I'm not sure why, given the definition, is put out in bold. > Monospaced would make more sense to me. could be a remote > candidate for bold. > > -- > Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net > > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026