Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2] (may be
	forged)) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA83247;
	Sat, 17 Jul 1999 13:23:11 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA20017;
	Sat, 17 Jul 1999 13:22:01 -0400 (EDT)
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
cc: Postgres Documentation List <docs@postgreSQL.org>,
	Postgres Hackers List <hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Merging old man pages 
In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 17 Jul 1999 16:31:51 +0000
	<3790AFF7.BB28F0B7@alumni.caltech.edu>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 13:22:01 -0400
Message-ID: <20015.932232121@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> We've now got a viable mechanism for generating man pages from sgml
> sources.

Excellent!

> From here on, there is no need to update the src/man/ man pages when
> updating docs. Please do all updates in doc/src/sgml/{.,/ref}/*.sgml.
> I'll be removing the old man pages from the cvs tree,

OK, let me get this straight: man pages will no longer be in the CVS
tree because they will no longer be original files, but they will be
part of the standard distribution as derived files, right?

			regards, tom lane