Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g1IMEdE67851 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:14:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id g1IMEZo06547; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:14:35 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200202182214.g1IMEZo06547@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: patches In-Reply-To: <66C2B4A2-24B9-11D6-8A15-00306596B4E8@monsterlabs.com> To: "Thomas F. O'Connell" Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:14:35 -0500 (EST) CC: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL96 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200202/22 X-Sequence-Number: 1251 Thomas F. O'Connell wrote: > i recently submitted a patch to this mailing list that hasn't been > applied. are docs handled the same way as general postgresql development > in terms of CVS access and whatnot? if so, do i need to clear any sort > of bureaucratic hurdles before i can submit patches? > > just curious. figured i'd try to DIY to help the project and save some > time... I don't see the patch anywhere, neither in my mailbox nor in the 7.3 queue: http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches2 Maybe it is stalled in the patches queue. Were you subscribed to patches list? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026