public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

7.3 rc1 timestamp description typos
3+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* 7.3 rc1 timestamp description typos
@ 2002-11-22 14:00  Bruno Wolff III <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread

From: Bruno Wolff III @ 2002-11-22 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-docs

In section 5.5.1.3 the following paragraph has a couple of typos:
Time stamp types exist as timestamp [ (p) ], timestamp [ (p) ] without
time zone and timestamp [ (p) ] without time zone. A plain timestamp
is equivalent to timestamp without timezone.

timestamp [ (p) ] without time zone is repeated twice in the list and
timestamp [ (p) } with time zone wasn't listed. The last sentence uses
"timezone" instead of "time zone".



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 7.3 rc1 timestamp description typos
@ 2002-11-22 15:22  Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  parent: Bruno Wolff III <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2002-11-22 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruno Wolff III <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

Bruno Wolff III <[email protected]> writes:
> In section 5.5.1.3 the following paragraph has a couple of typos:

I think I fixed all that yesterday; please look at the current doc
snapshot.
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/datatype-datetime.html

			regards, tom lane



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 7.3 rc1 timestamp description typos
@ 2002-11-22 15:50  Bruno Wolff III <[email protected]>
  parent: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread

From: Bruno Wolff III @ 2002-11-22 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-docs

On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:22:09 -0500,
  Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III <[email protected]> writes:
> > In section 5.5.1.3 the following paragraph has a couple of typos:
> 
> I think I fixed all that yesterday; please look at the current doc
> snapshot.
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/datatype-datetime.html
> 
> 			regards, tom lane

It does look OK in the development docs.

I wasn't expecting a lot of changes in the docs to be going on so I
thought my local rc1 copy would be relatively current. However that
was not a good assumption since I see that a lot of date/time documentation
has been changed very recently.




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-22 15:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-22 14:00 7.3 rc1 timestamp description typos Bruno Wolff III <[email protected]>
2002-11-22 15:22 ` Tom Lane <[email protected]>
2002-11-22 15:50   ` Bruno Wolff III <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox