Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC5E476E5F for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 21:17:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51C44771B6 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 20:51:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65738A492D; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 21:51:31 -0400 (AST) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 21:51:31 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Tom Lane Cc: Lamar Owen , Joe Conway , Peter Eisentraut , "" Subject: Re: Documentation in book length In-Reply-To: <5747.1041555865@sss.pgh.pa.us> Message-ID: <20030102215034.A40620@hub.org> References: <3E14C75A.90700@joeconway.com> <5134.1041550327@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200301021841.23651.lamar.owen@wgcr.org> <20030102205943.U40620@hub.org> <5747.1041555865@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200301/9 X-Sequence-Number: 1609 On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" writes: > >> http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb/ > >> > >> See the links on the left under 'RHDB 2.1 Documentation'. > > > they look like our docs ... what is different? > > They *are* our docs, just rearranged a bit. I don't recall the details > of what was done, but comparing the tables of contents would probably > show you most of the work. Well, since Peter is proposing a re-org of the docs into one book, do you want to invite the RedHat docs guys to join us?