X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.193]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DCF30F7A0 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:05:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53211-01 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 04:05:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from celery.tssi.com (celery.tssi.com [198.147.197.6]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 114F830F7E9 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 04:05:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 3483 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Jun 2003 07:05:23 -0000 Message-ID: <20030624070523.3482.qmail@celery.tssi.com> From: nolan@celery.tssi.com Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting PHP/MySQL thread To: josh@agliodbs.com (Josh Berkus) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 02:05:23 -0500 (CDT) Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org (\"'Advocacy PostgreSQL'\"), pgsql-general@postgresql.org ('PostgreSQL-general') In-Reply-To: <200306232304.04070.josh@agliodbs.com> from "Josh Berkus" at Jun 23, 2003 11:04:04 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200306/229 X-Sequence-Number: 1441 > ??? You can look at an HTML file directy with any browser. If you're SSH-ing > in to a remote system, use Lynx. Though I agree that providing both man and > html would be nicer. Try accessing a HTML file on a Linux system from a PC-based browser. Unless you have some kind of file sharing software running, which I generally don't because the only times I've ever been hacked into they got in through file sharing ports, you can't get there from here. > O'Reilly seems to be pretty hit-and-miss on this account. The Perl books are > well-indexed, but "SQL in a Nutshell" has *no* index, perhaps because > O'Reilly thought (wrongly) that it didn't need one because of the > dictionary-like format. The O'Reilly label is not a guarentee of quality, > just a general indicator. I think the 'Nutshell' books are a different breed of cat, none of them have ever had indexes worth mentioning. > Authors seldom do the indexes themselves, as indexing is a black art known to > few (and I have yet to see a really good index prepared by the author -- I've been somewhat involved in three book projects (two textbooks and one rule book), in all three case the authors did their own index. Maybe I've just had a good run of luck on the O'Reilly books I've bought, or maybe I haven't bought as many of them in the last three or four years as I used to. -- Mike Nolan