X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.193])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C73D30FB1D
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 25 Jun 2003 03:35:37 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193])
	by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 32415-05
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:35:27 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from wolff.to (wolff.to [66.93.249.74])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A951630E22E
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:35:26 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail 12458 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2003 03:38:50 -0000
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:38:50 -0500
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
Cc: PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Current CVS docs producing errors
Message-ID: <20030625033850.GA12404@wolff.to>
Mail-Followup-To: Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>,
	PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
References: <20030625025232.GA31072@wolff.to>
	<1056509551.69651.23.camel@jester> <20030625031856.GA3521@wolff.to>
	<1056511251.69651.33.camel@jester>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1056511251.69651.33.camel@jester>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Archive-Number: 200306/54
X-Sequence-Number: 1840

On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 23:20:52 -0400,
  Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca> wrote:
> 
> Are you sure you don't have local changes? A conflict perhaps?

I had wiped what I had tonight to get a clean copy from CVS as I had
been testing a patch to fix some problems with sockaddr and wanted to
see if things worked from CVS now.

I am not using any local patches. I am running a recent version of
openjade (1.3.3-pre1), but it worked for me last week.

> 
> Try removing datatype.sgml and re-fetching it again.

I just tried that and it didn't help.

> 
> Below is the only change to that file in a number of days, and it looks
> fine to me.
> 
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml/datatype.sgml.diff?r1=1.117&r2=1.118

I looked at this and while I don't know SGML I expect that the complaints
are referring to some unclosed <row> entries that were added in that change.
They are in the last section of the differences (after line 2604).

> -- 
> Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
> 
> PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc