X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.193]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BD130FA02 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 03:44:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26683-08 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:44:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from wolff.to (wolff.to [66.93.249.74]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10F7630E22E for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:44:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 12563 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2003 03:48:08 -0000 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:48:08 -0500 From: Bruno Wolff III To: Rod Taylor , PostgreSQL Docs Subject: Re: Current CVS docs producing errors Message-ID: <20030625034808.GA12552@wolff.to> Mail-Followup-To: Rod Taylor , PostgreSQL Docs References: <20030625025232.GA31072@wolff.to> <1056509551.69651.23.camel@jester> <20030625031856.GA3521@wolff.to> <1056511251.69651.33.camel@jester> <20030625033850.GA12404@wolff.to> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030625033850.GA12404@wolff.to> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Archive-Number: 200306/55 X-Sequence-Number: 1841 On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 22:38:50 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > I looked at this and while I don't know SGML I expect that the complaints > are referring to some unclosed entries that were added in that change. > They are in the last section of the differences (after line 2604). I am testing with some s thrown in now and things seem to be working. I will send a diff shortly that you can look at.